Skip to main content

The Conceptualization of Human as a Resource

The notion of "human as a resource" emerged primarily during the industrial revolution and has since evolved into a fundamental concept in modern management theory (Kaufman, 2014). This conceptualization has shaped organizational practices and human resource management strategies across industries (Beer et al., 2015).


Industrial Revolution Origins

The systematic view of humans as productive resources began during the industrial revolution, when labor became increasingly standardized and quantifiable. Frederick Taylor's scientific management principles formalized this approach through time-motion studies and standardization of work processes (Taylor, 1911/2004). Mayo's (1933) Hawthorne studies later challenged this mechanistic view, introducing human relations theory to management thought.

Evolution of Human Resource Management

The transition from "personnel management" to "human resource management" reflected a paradigm shift in organizational thinking (Legge, 2005). Drucker (1954) popularized the term "human resources," emphasizing workers as valuable organizational assets rather than mere cost factors.

Advantages of the Resource Perspective

Research by Huselid (1995) demonstrated that strategic human resource management practices correlate with Enhanced productivity, Improved financial performance and Lower employee turnover.

Limitations and Ethical Concerns

Critics like Greenwood (2002) and Legge (2005) identify several problematic aspects such as Dehumanization risks, Reduction of complex human attributes to metrics and Ethical implications of instrumentalization.

Contemporary Developments

Shifting Paradigms

Recent scholarship (Ulrich & Dulebohn, 2015) identifies emerging trends in Employee well-being initiatives, Work-life balance consideration, Personal development emphasis and Sustainable human resource management (Ehnert, 2009).

Implications for Practice

Organizational Level

Meta-analyses (Combs et al., 2006) show positive relationships between High-performance work practices, Organizational performance and Employee satisfaction.

Policy Level

International Labor Organization standards (ILO, 2018) emphasize the requirements of  Worker rights protection, Ethical treatment guidelines, Sustainable practices.

Conclusion

While the "human as resource" conceptualization has provided valuable frameworks (Guest, 2017), its limitations necessitate more nuanced approaches balancing efficiency with human dignity. Future research should explore integrative models that honour both organizational and human needs.


References

Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 427-438.

Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.

Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable Human Resource Management: A Conceptual and Exploratory Analysis from a Paradox Perspective. Springer.

Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261-278.

Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well‐being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22-38.

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.

Kaufman, B. E. (2014). The historical development of American HRM broadly viewed. Human Resource Management Review, 24(3), 196-218.

Legge, K. (2005). Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities (Anniversary ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Taylor, F. W. (2004). Scientific Management. Routledge. (Original work published 1911)

Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015). Are we there yet? What's next for HR? Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 188-204.

Comments

  1. Good blog entry on how human resources should be viewed as a strategic resource. Pervasive focus on the part of employees in the growth of organisations underlines the importance of HRM practices. Close count for the appreciation of all that HR does!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Suraj tries to explain how the idea of “human as a resource” started during the industrial revolution and has evolved over time. It highlights the shift from viewing workers as costs to seeing them as valuable assets. The post also discusses the benefits of strategic human resource management, like better productivity and lower turnover. It mentions recent trends like employee well-being and work-life balance. Overall, this is a good describe according to the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The evolution of "human as a resource" highlights the shift from viewing employees as costs to recognizing their intrinsic value, shaping modern HR practices that prioritize employee engagement and productivity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The post effectively traces the development of the concept human as a resource indicating both the historical roots and contemporary implications. It critically weighs the consideration of efficiency with human dignity calling for subtle approaches from HRM that respect the needs of individuals while fostering their success within organizations. A thought provoking look at a very vital topic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good Mr.suraj thoughtfully explores the idea of viewing employees as whole individuals, not just “human resources.” It highlights how respecting personal identities, goals, and values in the workplace leads to a more motivated and loyal workforce. Recognizing employees' unique contributions and encouraging personal growth ultimately benefits both the individual and the organization. A meaningful read that sheds light on the importance of seeing people beyond their job roles.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Amila, please start your discussion on 'The Conceptualization of Humans as Resources.' In the past, employees were treated as costs, but now they are seen as more valuable than any other assets. This shift is significant because while other assets can only make things possible, it is human resources that make things happen.
    As you mentioned, it is essential to view humans as assets rather than costs. Ultimately, any organization can succeed and sustain itself only if its employees work toward their targets. To achieve this, employees must be given the respect they deserve, as everyone has dignity. This is a good post not to be missed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The concept of "human as a resource" highlights the importance of employees in achieving organizational goals. Balancing productivity with human dignity is crucial. Modern HR practices must prioritize employee well-being and development to create a work culture that values both efficiency and individual respect.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supply to Demand: Can Sri Lankan Education cater for the up coming industrial requirements

T oday Sri Lanka manufacturing industry is facing a huge issue of finding well fit employees to its contemporary requirements. With the globalisation, industry is facing for the threat of survival and all the manufacturing sectors are adopting to Industrial revolution 4.0 demands .   Industry 4.0 can be defined as the integration of intelligent digital technologies into manufacturing and industrial processes (SAP). Technologies such as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), cloud connectivity, AI, and machine learning are now deeply woven into the manufacturing process. This unified and integrated approach to manufacturing results in products, factories, and assets that are connected and intelligent. Is Sri Lankan Education Ready to Supply the demand?  Even though the literacy rate of Sri Lanka has been reported as 92.49 % in 2022 according to the World Bank collection of development indicators,knowledge towards science and computer literacy is not in a satisfactory level. Majo...

What is the roll of HRM in revolution of Industrial 5.0 ?

The industrial landscape is rapidly evolving with the advent of Industry 5.0, characterized by the integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and the Internet of Things into manufacturing processes. This transformation brings about a host of challenges for Human Resource Management (HRM) professionals as they navigate the complexities of managing a workforce in this new era  [1] . One of the primary challenges facing HRM in Industry 5.0 is the need to upskill and reskill employees to keep pace with technological advancements. As automation and digitization become more prevalent in the workplace, there is a growing demand for workers with specialized technical skills. HRM professionals must develop training programs and initiatives to ensure that employees are equipped with the necessary skills to thrive in this new environment  [2] . Additionally, the rise of remote work and virtual teams in Industry 5.0 presents challenges in terms of mana...

High Employee Dissatisfaction with Human Resource Management Systems in Sri Lankan Organizations

Human Resource Management systems play a crucial role in organizational success and employee satisfaction. In Sri Lanka, the evolution of HRM practices has been influenced by both colonial legacy and modern Western management principles. However, emerging research indicates widespread dissatisfaction among employees regarding current HRM systems (Opatha, 2019). This study aims to analyze the root causes of this dissatisfaction and its implications for organizational effectiveness. Sri Lankan organizational culture, characterized by high power distance and collectivism, often conflicts with individualistic Western HRM practices. Evidences  indicates that Sri Lankan organizations predominantly follow traditional personnel management approaches despite claiming modern HRM adoption (Wickramasinghe, 2018). Key characteristics include: - Bureaucratic administrative systems - Hierarchical decision-making processes - Limited employee participation - Inadequate performance management system...